Sunday, January 02, 2011

Literal Metaphor

I mean that literally really means

Please take my metaphor seriously!

I phrased that a couple of decades ago: writer pk was really cooking in the late 1980s (too bad so few noticed). The line got added to Knatz.com somewhere in the 90s. Knatz.com and all my domains got scuttled in 2007, following my arrest in 2006, the US censoring me in early 07. It got posted to my InfoAll blog when I recreated my Knatz.com / Personal / Overview / Training / section there.

The way I present it here is an oxymoron: a sterling example of macroinformation, as the title juxtaposes incompatible logical types: literal and metaphor commonly being understood to be opposites, like real and fictitious and macroinformation is processed information, information interpreted in the light of friction among logical types.

The idea is fundamental to pk thinking and teaching. But to get it properly you have to also understand pk informational cosmology, with it existential sets: Pleroma, Creatura, Sentiens, Persona ... Pathologica ... Only Pleroma, the physical universe, is in any sense literally real. All else is mental, informational (macroinformational: metaphorical!

You, me ... we are ideas! that change, grow, purify; decay, get polluted ... moment by moment.

And so long as overpopulated kleptocracies continue to compel stone-age belief systems, continue to coerce unsupportable ideas (like education, taxation, conscription ...) the idea that a Christ can (or should) save us is preposterous: almost as preposterous as the idea that universities (media or churches or Congress) are competent to process ideas.

And those of us who believe in liberty and learning and information may as well gargle gibberish.

Saturday, January 01, 2011

pk Profile 2011

pk here. I'm the man who believes what I believed as a boy: that the state had no right put me – or anyone else – in school.

I'm the writer who believes that it's past time to take Jesus down off the cross, to stop torturing him, to stop perverting god, the truth, the nature of reality. Given sixty years to try, publishers have never published any of it.

I'm the scholar who reads Shakespeare's sonnets by mapping the Fair Love / Dark Lady onto the epistemological impasse between the Scholastic Realism of the Middle Ages and the heretical nominalism which gave birth to science (and modern individualism). The universities don't have a clue, interrupt me the way the public school did.

I'm the thinker who explains the universe in terms of information, complex information, processed, interpreted, multi-dimensional information, in terms of macroinformation.

I'm the reformer who offered digital librarianship, cybernetic data-basing / social networking / quality-control feedback, an anarchist internet of voluntary-only information: forty-one years ago. Corporations, the government ... waited: then stole it.

Sick of kleptocracy, of thieves in charge, I wrote a satire: and to jail I went: censored, my thousands of essays stripped from the kleptocracy's plagiarized internet. How did the government come to be in charge of what CERN, the Pentagon, and MIT had stolen from god, from Christ, from Ivan Illich, from me? And from you!


Note: none of my messages have been received; all were interfered with!

Now I have only one message:
None of my messages have been received!

pk online

Post a Comment: or,
EMail to:

pk@Knatz.com

pk online (I'm salting this several places at several blogs.)
Knatz.com, InfoAll.org, Macroinformation.org, PKImaging, com, AgainstHierarchy.org, several thousands of essays, stories, reprints, graphics, were halted by my arrest for posting a satire which the addressee and the fed conspired to misread. My five domains were obliterated at my sentencing, 2007 February, where my public defender, having convinced me, possibly rightly, that I'd never get out of jail alive, or be able to tell what happened, if I didn't pead guilty, allowed the court its head to destroy me by introducing zero relevant evidence. Fair trial means the defense helps hold the victim still.

But that's alright: human beings are not competent to judge. God will show that at Judgment, as though it needed showing. If there is no Judgment, if the truth will never be shown to humans, that's alright too: we'll just be dead and gone, with no proper memorial. (Why should we have a memorial? We have one: in the Christian religion, which not three Christians understand.)

Meantime, my money evaporated, my business destroyed, all my testimonies obliterated, I try to restore Knatz.com (and other pk domain materials) to the pk blogs not censored by the state: adding other blogs, new since 2007, for the purpose.

Alphabetically:
CybRev
InfoAll
InsTic
IonaArc
Macroinformation
PaulKnatz
pkKlep
pkTheo
pkTools
pKnatzQuotes

Featuring by Importance:
pkToolsNothing is more important to the possibility of human survival than the proper development of intelligence. pk comments on some basic Thinking Tools.
MacroinformationNothing exists in the human mind except by information, as information. We think we see rocks and trees and cities; no, we see, we think, we are information. We grossly misunderstand everything without my theory of Macroinformation (a particular Thinking Tool).
InsTicInstitutions come to serve ends incompatible with their charter. Illich was the great critic of institutions: pk expands on Illich.
InfoAllpk's Ivan Illich and deschooling materials spun off from Knatz.com to InfoAll.org. First the blog supplemented: now the blog tries, weakly, to substitute.
IonaArcKnatz.com's original supplementary blog
PaulKnatzRecreates Knatz.com stuff not extended to IonaArc
pkKleppk comments on kleptocracy. I showed a way around kleptocracy, I got destroyed for my trouble.
pkTheoThe bulk of my messages have always been cosmological, theological, epistemological.
pKnatzQuotesGathering and further editing Knatz.com's quotes files: quotes by Speaker, quotes by Topic, quotes by pk.

Other pk blogs of receding importance:
pkBowdlerstillborn pk self-censorship: sex comments, etc.
HSCenterpk created this blog to show the Highlands Senior Center what could be done with a blog, what could be done with a domain: a waste of time: they just sabotaged my work.

Thursday, December 30, 2010

Faith

There's a reason for faith commonly under-appreciated:

We humans can't function without faith. We know nothing without faith. When we bark our shins we're showing faith in our sensory system: faith that the pain in our leg represents contact with a physical universe. We don't know anything without faith.

Faith can be overdone. Witness St. Paul.

Which brings me to my point: humans use faith to displace whatever they want displaced: experience, reason, logic ... Faith can substitute for any of them. Schools, churches, media ... dispense faith.

A gallimaufry of examples may be the least misleading (just a couple to start):
We drop bombs on people. Common logic would indicate that that's bad, but no: with faith, we can see that that's how Americans help people. Americans are helpful. Isn't that what the papers say?

We murder Christ, drink his blood, eat his flesh. You'd think we're murderers, deicides, vampires, cannibals; no, with faith it proves that we're saved, God's Chosen.

We just lost nine bets in a row at the track. You might think that that means that gambling is for fools. No, with faith, it proves that we'll hit the jackpot next time.

Friday, December 24, 2010

Some, More, Too Many

We're a social species. Groupness was chosen for us as a survival strategy by our species/environment ecology long before any of us as individuals could have been considered intelligent. The ploy that made us money yesterday can put us in the red tomorrow. I'm for groupness: never mind that I had no more choice in the matter than you did. But for the last few decades I've been dragging my feet about super-groupness. I've love mankind in ones, and occasionally by the dozen: but I dread all groups larger than what I believe was the correct size for a human group: maximizing around two hundred, two-hundred and fifty.

Group a um

I love Jesus, however rickety the sources of our stories about him. I love his twelve disciples. I love how Leonardo grouped them into sub-groups: three, three; six, six: seven: thirteen, with an odd extra, a female confusing everything.


Leonardo, Last Supper


I love the early church: a few hundred Christians, hiding from the Romans: like Jews hiding from Hitler. But I hate the Church.

I love Daniel Boone, Buffalo Bill ... but I hate nations. I hate two hundred million Americans become three hundred. I hate a world population of a billion become four billion, five billion ...

There are lots of good things that are good, good, good: but then become toxic. Human groups cooperate as well as compete, they love as well as hate, they help as well as sabotage. If Roosevelt opens the door for Stalin, that's nice; but when Mussolini cooperates with Hitler's murdering Poles, something's gone wrong. Even cooperation can turn toxic.

Watch out for human groupness turning super-toxic. I sometimes with we were back on the savanna, lucky to find a dead bug.

Tuesday, December 14, 2010

Plant Succession, Human Recession

I just posted news at another blog on Jan's slash pine falling in yesterday's winds. That post was about Jan and her beautiful home and grounds (and lake) ... This post will continue hints begun there on Florida ecology: specifically on human disruption of Florida ecology, focusing on pine flat woods, and detailing recent history of Lake Charlotte, here in Sebring, Highlands Country, Florida.


Plant Succession
Pine flat woods had been the dominant environment in pre-civilized Florida. Florida has been above sea level for at least ten million years. Gradually the sea receded, creating dry land around the Highland Ridge than runs from what is today Lake Wales south to today's Lake Placid. Florida plant succession would have begun with scrub land. Pine flatwoods and other environments such as bogs and cypress swamp would have followed. The original Florida would have been scrub, followed by scrub with pine flatwoods taking over more and more territory. In the last couple of million years hammocks developed: islands of hardwood trees, some deciduous, and palm trees, taking over moist low lying but not swampy ground.

The common pine of Florida is the slash pine. Slash pine, when Morgan and Flagler developed Florida (once the US army had cleared inconvenient humans aside for them) covered 60% or more of the territory. Hammocks range from just a few trees to a forest as large as Highlands Hammock, here on the west side of Sebring. The health and continuing identity of a pine flatwoods depended on natural fire. Periodic natural fire kills off the oak trees growing up as "weeds" amid the pines, burns off ground fuel, permits light to penetrate to the under-story. Slash pine seeds cannot germinate without light. (Scrub pine seeds cannot germinate till fire has opened the cones!)

Human Recession
Humans have lived in Florida for some time, but not in large numbers prior to Morgan and Flagler. Once Florida was developed, pine flatwoods was the common environment, so pine flatwoods was the environment to be superceded by human settlement. Humans at first employed fire for slash and burn farming, but post-Flagler humans repressed fire. Oaks persevered. Pine seeds got shaded into sterility. Ground fuel accumulated: so when fire did come there was danger of it building a momentum that the slash pine had insufficient resistance to. Thus sea bed gives way to scrub, scrub gives way to pine flatwoods, pine flatwoods shares borders with hammock, with swamp, with bog, with bay head, and then to human settlement, and then ... to catastrophe: potential catastrophe anyway.

Jan has lived on her lake in Sebring for a decade or so. A number of slash pine that made the property seem like something out of James Fennimore Cooper fell in that time. Today there are a half dozen magnificent pines, 75 to 85 or 90 feet tall, but only a half dozen. Today there is one fewer than yesterday. Note: there are no new pines growing up!

Plant life grows toward light. Dig a canal, clear a road, trees lean into the clearing. In Florida the soil is young, thin, poor in nutrients. When there's wind, and in Florida there's wind a plenty, and at more than one time of the year, the trees slip their moorings, fall into the road, into the canal. In 1990 I gave the history and ecology tours at Highlands Hammock State Park. I'd drive the tram along the canal built by the CCC in the 1930s at what was then the south border of the park. The south canal is bordered by hammock, by bog, by bay head, by pine flatwoods. Every day trees would have fallen into the canal, across the road: mostly red maples. Everyday the rangers would Vroom out to the south canal in their trucks with chain saws, and RRRR, RRRR cut the trees into logs and shove them to the side of the berm. Everyday, when I could, I would go out to the south canal, with a community service slave (or two) (when I could get them), and throw the logs off into the bay head so that the public, on the tour, would see an illusion of naturalness. Weekends, with a slave or three, I'd drag limbs and boles out of the canal and haul them off into the bay head, out of sight of "my" tour: cosmetics pretending to be natural. If I hadn't, the chances of the public spotting an alligator, or a cooter, let alone an otter, were negligible (despite the canal being way over-populated with alligators: once stretch sometimes had three dozen baby alligators visible in a compound "nursery": big mama also commonly visible. (The males, ten, sometimes fourteen feet, were visible to me when I ventured on foot into the side canals: we saw few big males along the south canal.))

At Jan's lake side a couple of grand pines lean westward, out over the lake. I hope their roots on the landward side are well anchored, because they visibly don't have much buttressing on their "weak" side. This set of facts in this case casts no blame on human behavior: the lake was there before the railroad blossomed Sebring's population, and before a widened Highway 27 exploded it, especially on the west side of 27, west of Lake Jackson. Certainly no blame can be laid at Jan's door: or at mine: I, who pick up the fallen pine cones for her, so that her "lawn" is unobstructed, imitating an English lawn, where the squire didn't contend with slash pine, "English" "landscape" having been concocted by human development over centuries, not just decades. (Isn't it amazing that humans mistake fingerprints of our activities as "nature"! schools doing nothing to correct us!) (There's been little nature in England for a long time: except insofar as everything is nature: including our interference.) But: everything else is evidence of the interference of development. The pine population isn't just waning; it's disappearing. A dozen pines become six, become four, become one, become none.

Ah, but we "gain." Everything is covered with potato-vines! The sky is blackout out by a superabundance of Spanish moss: indigenous to Florida but not common in unmolested pine flatwoods. That is, Jan's grounds were covered with vines and moss until I yanked most of it down and burned it on the beach.

I also clear ground fuel from her borders: and beyond her borders. Jan's property is beautiful in itself, both deep and wide, lush with growth, and on the lake. See some of my posts on her home at the PaulKnatz blog, 2010 September: a dozen and a half such posts, with views of the beach, and so forth. Southward, her property is bordered by a right of way the neighbors can use to access the lake. Further south the land is "jungle": unmaintained by the widow in residence. To the north Jan's lot is bordered by a lot wholly undeveloped. There the pines completely disappeared under the potato-vines: or had, till I cleared ten or twenty feet inward, improved Jan's view: and protecting Jan's home from fire, reducing the ground fuel.


Please allow for my preference for the possibility of a mankind governed by restraint, by good sense and good manners; while I am an enemy of unbridled human id. (I unbridle my own id, but that's just me; 6 billion of us are another matter. And if I thought it would help, I'd bridle my own!) I'm not for forest and against human settlement: until human settlement proves incompatible with forest: then I'm for forest and against human settlement. Humans in groups could have lived on earth for millions of years into the future (barring an unknown, perhaps unknowable, calamity). As it is I think I future is truncated, foreshortened.

details and exposition will be added over time

Sovereignty

A current (current/ancient) squabble between the Irish and the Church goads me:

I don't accept King George III's sovereignty in the Americas in the 18th Century, I don't accept it in the British Isles either.
We "white" "Americans" threw George and his redcoats out. Good, I approve. Except we didn't throw him out so people could be free of his sovereignty, we threw him out so our own King George, and his cronies, could be sovereign in his place. Take Palm Beach, Florida, for example: a nice stretch of Atlantic coastline. Natives lived there, and who wouldn't, given a choice? So we sovereign white people, sent our army, at the combined suggestion of JP Morgan and Henry Morrison Flagler: who wanted to develop and sell the other people's turf.

Gee, if I like Donald Trump's real estate, and if I were a sovereignty like George's England, or the other George's US (or like the Pope's Vatican!), could I send an army to chase Donald Trump off of 57th Street, so I could develop it?

If I had an army, the answer is, Yes: I could try. And if Trump yielded, I could claim sovereignty.

(But would it be true?)


My attitude toward sovereignty as divulged above is not new, not recent. It's acuity is chronic: across time. But here's a related change of pk attitude: once upon a time, for most of my life, since childhood, I would have conceded sovereignty to God. More recently I would have conceded sovereignty to god. Now I'm not sure I concede sovereignty to any entity.

I'm afraid that needs a lot of explanation: in this culture. I was raised to believe that the universe belonged to God. That he made it, that he hadn't sold it, or given it. Or, if he gave it (or sold it), the way he gave Israel to the Jews — "Israel" being occupied by Phoenicians the Jews called Canaanites — it still really belonged to him: so God could give, and God could take back: an Indian giver! (Of all the insults and injuries we visited upon natives — short of murder, genocide, etc. _ is any worse than still calling them by Columbus's mistake: "Indians"? Yes: maybe calling giving-with-strings-attached "Indian giving"!)

Let's concede that God owns the earth and the sky and the Jews ... and Israel. Let's concede that he owns you and me ... and every wog: every poor bastard born in the ghetto, every poor bastard born in Bangladesh, every poor bastard born in the New Guinean highlands, people who till recently had never heard of Africa let alone Europe let alone the US. Do we really concede that God has a right to torture the souls of those people for eternity if they don't get baptised? If God is sovereign, then he does. Just as if the US is sovereign, then we have the right to drop napalm on little girls, and bombs any damn where the President pleases! And the Vatican doesn't have to cooperate with charges brought against its priests! Sovereign!


It's been a long time since I've accepted the beliefs I was taught as a child: that the universe was magical, that it needed a creator to exist, that magic, not physics, determines things ... that the big magician owns everything, that he can give things to his special creature, man. Today I don't believe that humans are competent to have opinions probable of truth on any of these matters. Individuals are capable of learning, I see that, but I've become unconvinced that human society is capable of learning: short of a catastrophe so catastrophic that any shred of the species that came through the catastrophe would no longer be the same species: oh, please, I hope.

See? That last little reservation? Whom am I praying to? To a good god, to a progressive god, to a potential evolution, to something ... better.

But not to a god who owns anything!

Friday, December 10, 2010

Trying

Trying
drawing by bydlr

I'll be adding text here shortly

Wednesday, December 01, 2010

Flotsam Causes

Eight-ball into the side pocket! It's so easy, or it is with a little practice. You line up the 8-ball with the side pocket, you fix the line in your mind, you line up your cue ball with the spot on the 8-ball intersected by your imaginary line to the pocket, now you line up your cue stick, decide whether to roll the ball straight, whether to impact the cue ball low or in the middle, depending on where you want the cue ball to go after it impacts the 8-ball, decide if you want any English on the ball, and make your stroke. If your stroke is true, the 8-ball will fall into the side pocket: far more often than not. If it doesn't, then you didn't stroke it right, or, you didn't see your lines correctly, didn't make the right decision about where your balls impacted. In any case, unless there was an outside disturbance, an earthquake, the table disintegrated, the 8-ball went where you made if go regardless of where you intended to make it go. That's physics, that's the physical universe, the universe Gregory Bateson calls Pleroma. The trouble with our thinking is we think, and we are trained to think, by not very bright or original thinkers, that we live in the physical universe. Well, indirectly we do: the physical universe as modeled by our symbolic universe. But it's that later universe, or combination of universes, Creatura, Sentiens, that we directly live in: and in these universes of life, of symbols, of intelligence, of awareness, of false awareness, things are not simple.

I repeat a favorite illustration of my son's: Black Crayon. The school system learned that children who attempted suicide had used more black crayon in their drawings than normal: so they took all the children's black crayons away. The morons in charge of schools and children confused symptom and disease: they thought that by preventing the symptom, use of black crayons, they could prevent the disease. (Their action was irrelevant: except as a betrayal of liberty.)

Now here's an illustration that's long been a favorite of mine. The kid acts up in school, he's over-active, they say. They give the kid a med, you learn that the med is classified as a "stimulant," you go whoa! You're trying to calm the kid down, a stimulant is the last thing you should give him. Wrong: the stimulant tried by the staff stimulates the kid's activity repressor: it's the kid's natural depressive system that stimulated. Paradox? Only superficially. The logic is complex, but not illogical. That's Creatura, Sentiens: the universe of life.

But, I repeat: we think we live in Pleroma. We think that causes are as simple as lining up the 8-ball. We all do it. I do it.

Ferinstance, if you've read around pk enough surely you've seen his iterations of his identification with Jesus, the martyred god, with Galileo, the martyred genius .... The more so since my arrest in 2006. Still, it was not new thinking. I've identified with Jesus since childhood, and so do all Christians, even if not to the extent I do (or with the manifest justification!)

But dig this: in pk thinking, Christianity itself, Jesus himself, is subject to the same simplifications, the same vanities. God made man in God's image, a vain, self-maximizing fragment of consciousness.

I offered the world Illichian social networking in 1970 when I joined Illich's deschooling ideas to found the Free Learning Exchange. Cybernetic data basing, digital record keeping, in a public institution Not Controlled by Government! might allow humans to realize some of the social implications of Christianity, help us live together convivially, without the arrogance and interference of imperial kleptocracy. There, see? I think of myself as a cause! Well, of course I am a cause, and so are we all. But what is being caused is very complex: maybe there's an 8-ball involved and a cue ball, and maybe also an earthquake, and the table disintegrating.

When I invented the internet I was very much aware, and have routinely said, that "my" ideas had been floating around me for a decade at least, 1960ish: so much flotsam and jetsam. Now here's me, flotsam floating around amid jetsam. I encounter Illich, himself a jetsam floating around amid flotsam. He refers to Jesus in a way I resonate with, though I see Jesus as also so much flotsam floating around amid so much jetsam: in a world where Augustus Caesar, himself a Sargasso sea of flotsam and jetsam, was deluding himself that he could take 8-ball-in-the-side-pocket control of the world! Augustus influenced the world. So did Jesus. So do I, and you. So does the catatonic institutionalized in a box hosed out every other day by someone without a green card who the moment before stole the hearing aid from some old lady in the same facility.

Now here's the United States, stealing everything that is or isn't nailed down, paying royalties to those perceived as powerful and stomping extra hard on those perceived to be defenseless, deaf, and not accidentally, to my claims that it's my ideas that were stolen.

This is familiar. This is the universe of life, subset Sentiens, complicated by politics: the state of people organized for leverage, bossing people down-tide of them. I don't claim to understand it all: what I claim is that the Augustus Caesars, the Hitlers, the Nixons, don't understand it, understand if far less well than I do, but lack the humility to admit it, as well as the intelligence to understand it half as well as I do: and too stupid to see that it's they who are helping to disintegrate the table!

The majority is always smarter than some minority, but also less smart, far less, than some other minority.

I like to trust that god is smart, but fear that he too, at least the capitalized one, God, is so much flotsam. So instead, these days, I just trust that the 8-ball is going where we actually sent it, never mind where we meant to send it.


Bateson's cosmology of Pleroma and Creatura I report on and developed further (Sentiens ...) at Macroinformation.org. That domain got destroyed, is still down, but some material is being restored (and further explored) at my Macroinformation blog. (Same host as IonaArc.)

Thursday, November 18, 2010

Imagine You're Not Here

I have too much imagination: that's the reason the Director of Continuing Education gave for firing me. That was in 1973. The company was Stone and Webster which engineered nuclear power plants. John Constance hired me to be his assistant director but I'd come to make him antsy. I love his reason the more because by 1973 I was accusing the world, including Stone and Webster and John Dennis Constance of having too little imagination: I'd founded the Free Learning Exchange to offer digital librarianship of community resources as a replacement for coercive kleptocracy and its sleight of hand institutions, its compulsory school system preeminently. But the world was to self-complacent to save itself: an inconvenience to me but fatal to all of us.

But before I met Ivan Illich's concept of cybernetic social networking in 1970 I already had a favorite example of humans' lack of imagination. Hark back a decade or so before that. In the 1950s we worried about the nuclear bombs that we'd made and used coming back in our own face. Somewhere around 1960-something I saw a British documentary which shared the fear and pretended to marshal it. The film asked the audience to imagine a nuclear attack and then showed the film's own story board scenario fleshed by actors. We watched stiff upper lip Brits queuing up for food and water, all very civilized, very British. No, you fools: first you have to imagine that this theater is empty, or burned into nonexistence, we're all dead. Or most of us are dead and those few who are still alive and mobile are not queueing up nicely; they're gouging each others eyes for a sip of water.

The movie should I believe have asked us first of all to imagine that 99.9% of us, the lucky ones, were no longer alive.

Wednesday, November 17, 2010

Telephone

Cro-Magnon man could walk, run, hide in a cave. When you had diarrhea you could hide behind a bush, but everyone knew. Your family, your group, knew your ass, your guts, you knew theirs. With agriculture man came to live in "houses." By Roman times the rich lived in houses that afforded "privacy." Unable to see out, others unable to see in, you could abide in the bosom of your hearth, imagining that you were safe: and, once Hannibal was defeated, you were: for the moment. The Romans did the kicking, everyone else in reach got kicked.

By the time of the British version of empire the rich man lived in a house. He didn't answer the door, a butler answered the door, or a maid, or his perfectly behaved wife, or his perfectly behaved child. In the office outsiders could reach the rich man only through his secretary. The sheriff knocked down the door of the poor man, but by 1860, if the sheriff thought the plantation owner had committed murder, the sheriff rode up to the plantation house, bowing, showing deference: the black butler would answer the door, the black butler would show deference to the sheriff while the sheriff showed deference to the plantation owner in the person of the black butler. Eventually the sheriff would stammer out a message, Please, if it pleases, I have come, to, with your permission, arrest you, Your Ownership.

By the early Twentieth Century Hollywood was inventing itself. Movies that a short time before would have been made in NY or NJ or Chicago were made in Hollywood, near the hills above LA. Charlie Chaplin, a London music hall transplant, redefined fame while he redefined film wealth. Chaplin was the first film star to sign a contract for $1,000 a week. It made headlines everywhere. Chaplin, at the time of signing, asked could they make it $1,025? What was the $25 for? I need something to live on, he answered. Chaplin was planning to spend the entire big bill on production: he himself could live nearly on air. Before long Chaplin was making one feature film instead of multiple short films: one and two reelers. Chaplin set new financial records when his Modern Times charged $2 admission. The studios said no one would pay it, Chaplin said they would: and they did. Chaplin made a feature every five years or so thereafter, and though he continued to pay salaries to favorites such as Edna Purviance for decades in exchange for no obligations on their part whatsoever, Chaplin kept a great deal of the money from his features for himself and his own private uses. Ah, you may think, so that's why he lived out his old age with Eugene O'Neil's daughter, Oona, on a mountain in Switzerland, vacationing on the Riviera at will. No. Chaplin's Hollywood wealth paled beside the money he'd made by putting his Hollywood wealth into the phone company.

Chaplin got rich enough in Hollywood to become very rich on Wall Street; but, Chaplin wouldn't allow one of the black beasts into his home. If you wanted to sell Chaplin a Fuller brush, you had to knock on his door and deal with the butler. Chaplin, the twentieth-century rich man, had no phone.

Knatz.com's Teaching / Thinking Tools repeated Gregory Bateson's comments on communication under the metaphor of the game telephone. Gather people, have a party. Assign person A to write a brief message on a piece of paper and hand it to person Z. Person A then whispers the message to person B who whispers it to person C. When "the message" has been passed to all participants, that person declares the message aloud. Person Z then reads the original written version of the message. Commonly there will be little resemblance between the "original" signal and the message as relayed.

I was just doing something in the bedroom. The phone rang. Rather than answer the bedroom phone I walked to my desk chair by my Mac, in the front of the house, sat down, and picked up. A voice with an accent that may have been from the subcontinent, some form of "Indian," said something that I interpreted to mean, Am I Mr. Knatz? Yes, I said and endured some more noise in that accent. "I don't hear well," I explained. "So far I've understood nearly nothing of what you've said." I listened further, assuming that it was a telemarketer, but not having proved it yet. I next explained that of the latest barrage I'd herd one word, but still made no sense of it: something Alliance.

Why wasn't the butler taking care of this for me? Why wasn't my perfectly behaved wife? or child?

Nah. I had to hang up on her myself.

Such Knowledge

After such knowledge, what forgiveness?
TS Eliot

Pre-dawn this morning that line by TS Eliot came into my head — After such knowledge, what forgiveness? — for the first time since I can't remember when. That's funny, that line used to live in my head, daily: 1956 or so when I first read it, through 1961, '64 when it was a regular visitor. It's been so long now since I've read any TS Eliot at all I don't even remember which poem the line is from!

After such knowledge, what forgiveness? Knowledge, forgiveness: Christian themes, pk themes. TS Eliot themes.

But it's 2010! What does the Twenty-first Century have to do with knowledge? with God? with forgiveness?

Of course it's the Christian shtick that we can be forgiven no matter what: if we are repentant. if we put our trust in the Lord.

But we're not repentant! What trust do we put in the Lord? We're not contrite. If we're contrite, say, over Vietnam, what are we doing bombing Afghanistan?

Are we bombing Afghanistan? I don't know. I no longer know anything. That I ever thought I knew much was all illusion, an illusion forcibly inherited from my far from honest or intelligent or knowledgeable or forgiven culture.

PS I see I had it in my quotes files, at Knatz.com and at pKnatzQuotes blog. So it has been in my head more recently that I'd said. Wrong about another thing.

Tuesday, November 16, 2010

Mislabel

Knatz.com was big on the concepts of misrepresentation and mislabeling. Knatz.com got deposed: domino-censored, in the wake of federal censorship of my AgainstHierarchy.org. My unconstitutional arrest and subsequent parole is now over. Of course they can arrest me again, but their threat of constantly watching me is now officially expired.

Before my arrest I'd featured some Knatz.com modules by posting them here at IonaArc. Since my release I've added a couple, then others at my PaulKnatz blog. But I haven't get gotten to add my pieces on mislabeling and misrepresentation.

The Christian story shows the Temple of Jerusalem pretending to represent God while instigating to get Jesus crucified. The Temple of Jerusalem still exists, is still in business.
Ivan Illich said similar (that is to say, profoundly Christian) things about the Roman Catholic Church. (He himself was a priest, a monseigneur!) The Roman Catholic Church pretends to represent Jesus Christ. It's claim is not better based than the claims of the Temple of Jerusalem.

Jesus got crucified.
Illich got defrocked, the rug pulled from under him.

I, pk, a disciple of Jesus (via Ivan Illich and direclty) say that the United States pretends to represent the people of America but that we, US, do not. We do not represent God or Jesus or the People. We are thieves, kleptocrats. We are the damned.

We, as a group; not me, individually.

I'll be adding more about this: but everything I've written in the last forty years says the same things. You don't know my writing because your owners do not want you to know my writing: or Jesus' words: or God's words.

But of course there I'm doing a little mislabeling of my own: using metaphors at least, using metaphors I know the kleptocrats are constitutionally incapable of understanding: God doesn't speak in words, though all possible messages are there: here: in the universe. It takes science to read it: science rendered impossible by coercively state-run everything.


Knatz.com's Thinking Tools made this point (not yet transferred to pkTools blog):
Raymond Smullyan delighted the Johnny Carson show with a logical puzzle: say you have three containers. One holds dimes, another holds nickels, the third mixes dimes and nickels. Each is labeled: with one of the three possible lables. Each is mislabeled!
Raymond asked Johnny (and the audience): What's the fewest number of containers you have to open to figure out the correct labels: and what's the fewest number of coins that have to be examined.
And the answer is: One coin from one container: that is, one coin specifically from the mislabeled "Mixed" container.
Think about it: you'll see.

Now: Knatz.com had told that story, and made the following point: but before continuing the point, I merge with another, related point: Newton figured out the gravitational relationship of the earth and the moon. Newton figured that the earth and the moon held each other by gravitational lassoes as it were. There were two forces: gravity, holding the two bodies together, and inertia, making the two bodies want to get away from each other on a tangent, like a stone thrown from a sling. Newton decided that the two forces just balanced: and the moon and earth remained tethered. (Modern science agrees, with a slight modification: the moon is actually pulling away, slightly.
New posed and solved the species' first Two Body problem.

Writing my novel By the Hair of the Comet in 1982 ff., I wanted to calculate the ephemeris of a fictitious comet. I asked an engineer with a fondness for science fiction to help me with my Three Body problem. I wanted to use the sun's mass and Jupiter's mass to estimate a path for a comet of mass x. The engineer could only bluster. There are no solutions for three body problems. Human genius is already impressed with itself for getting a toe-hold with a Two Body problem.

Now: Raymond figured out a Three Mislabels problem: But human beings live in a world where Everything is mislabeled! There's no logic that can solve our problems.

Newton, fabulous genius: not smart enough. Raymond: very clever: not smart enough.
Illich, Fuller ... pk: not smart enough.

Now: will we live long enough to see: Is God smart enough?
Can evolution find a way for life to survive despite kleptocrats ruling everything? Crucifying gods, defrocking saints, jailing cybernetic revolutionaries.

Wednesday, November 10, 2010

Golgotha

The people stood around Golgotha with their thumb in their ass while Jesus was crucified.

Of course it's impossible to tell how true the story is: like most stories it's fairly empty of facts. But I know this: today,

Christians stand around with their thumb in their ass
while Jesus' disciples get much the same treatment
!

And do you know what? what may be worse?

Americans stand around with their thumb in their ass while freedom fighters are persecuted, the society using its whole arsenal to remain kleptocrats, damned, unChristian: and not free.

Hypocrites coming and going.

Friday, November 05, 2010

Satisfied

I'll be satisfied when God puts everyone in hell. Once there I hope he'll use me to explain to a finally captive audience why they're there: exactly what I already do, for God, without the audience.

But what if God doesn't put everyone in hell? Or what if there is no God, no matter how clearly he's communicated to me? Or what if there is no hell: other than here, right now, and all time previously over the last five or ten thousand years?

Oh, well: I never really expected to be satisfied anyway.

Saturday, October 30, 2010

To Be

To be or not to be. How old were you before you even began to understand Hamlet's opening words to his most famous soliloquy? I recall clearly that it was so much gibberish to me before I began to absorb even the obverse meaning, the literal meaning. If you accept Christian dogma, including the dogma of Original Sin, then what right could we possibly have to exist: unless and until God forgives us, saves us? On another hand if your a naturalist, then surely we have a right to be born, to breathe, to eat ... to move around ... to breathe out, to defecate, to pollute ...

How's this for literature?
You are a child of the universe, no less than the trees and the stars; you have a right to be here.Recognize it? Does this help?Go placidly amid the noise and haste, and remember what peace there may be in silence.I first saw those lines printed in a church on the south shore of Lake Geneva. It thrilled me. It was a Christian church, pseudo gothic, but I tell you the prose is pure blasphemy: there's no original sin in it, and the God doesn't jibe with any Christian orthodoxy. This is a secular poem with a God you can make up as yo go along. The church's post offered a provenance: "found in a Baltimore church in 1692." In fact here's the whole quote:Go placidly amid the noise and haste, and remember what peace there may be in silence.

As far as possible, without surrender, be on good terms with all persons. Speak your truth quietly and clearly; and listen to others, even to the dull and the ignorant, they too have their story. Avoid loud and aggressive persons, they are vexations to the spirit.

If you compare yourself with others, you may become vain and bitter; for always there will be greater and lesser persons than yourself. Enjoy your achievements as well as your plans. Keep interested in your own career, however humble; it is a real possession in the changing fortunes of time.

Exercise caution in your business affairs, for the world is full of trickery. But let this not blind you to what virtue there is; many persons strive for high ideals, and everywhere life is full of heroism. Be yourself. Especially, do not feign affection. Neither be cynical about love, for in the face of all aridity and disenchantment it is perennial as the grass.

Take kindly to the counsel of the years, gracefully surrendering the things of youth. Nurture strength of spirit to shield you in sudden misfortune. But do not distress yourself with imaginings. Many fears are born of fatigue and loneliness.

Beyond a wholesome discipline, be gentle with yourself. You are a child of the universe, no less than the trees and the stars; you have a right to be here. And whether or not it is clear to you, no doubt the universe is unfolding as it should.

Therefore be at peace with God, whatever you conceive Him to be, and whatever your labors and aspirations, in the noisy confusion of life, keep peace in your soul.

With all its sham, drudgery and broken dreams, it is still a beautiful world.

Be cheerful. Strive to be happy.
Makes you feel holy? It's a secular holiness, not at all Christian. And trust me: I know seventeen-century English: and that prose is post-Eighteenth Century! But then the story is well known by now. See for example this. Another church passing around more misinformation.

Before the Romans (and the Jews), cultures of law, no one, nothing, needed a right to exist. It's only in an over-crowded over-managed (kleptocratic) world, a world full of laws and lawyers, a world run by manipulated ambiguities, that anything needs a right to exist.

Christianity is kleptocracy that would shame us, then allow us relief: salvation: if we behave (not the way God said; the way the kleptocrats say!) Contemporary kleptocracy, kleptocracy descended from the eighteenth-century rationalists (ha ha, meaning atheists, of course, deists, like Jefferson, Adams, Washington) would shuck us of our designer guilt and recloth us as innocent thieves (who don't even know what they're stealing, that they're tresspassing).

Aside: Do you know this Woody Guthrie verse? Everybody knows his This land is your land, this land is my land ...
As I went walking
Along the woodlands
I saw a sign there,
Said No Trespassing.
But on the other side
It didn't say nothin'.
That side was made
for you and me!Never mind if my words are slightly different from some printed version: Woody wouldn't have. He changed his own lyrics as he sang: there's no one correct version. He's a folk hero, not an editor.

Note further: Woody wrote that and many another song in a project for FD Roosevelt. The politics are very complex. The sentiments are largely left: meaning government control, government interference, meaning socialism; on the other hand the anarchist sentiments are ineradicable. I love Guthrie for the anarchism, and the humanity, not at all for the alignment with the Democrats.

Friday, October 29, 2010

Sutter's Gold

It isn't just that we stole Sutter's gold, while we invaded his domain, destroyed his farm, killed his livestock; it's also that we had ignored him when he invited us to join him as associates.

Sutter was born in Switzerland. He began setting his life in the new world up in New York (hung out in Brooklyn, knew Edgar Allen Poe), but soon headed west: at a time when it was well established that no one knew how to cross the Rockies: the Pacific wasn't the limit; the mountains were the limit. Sutter looked for fellow explorers to discover such a passage. He found no helpers. He found a way alone. We learned the way because he had found the way: unaided by us.

Sutter got to California, saw that the Sacramento Valley was ideal for agriculture. Again, he looked for partners, for associates, for fellow laborers and investors. He found none. He sailed further west, to Hawaii. There he found partners: Hawaiians who would invest their labor in return for a share of results. Sutter named his enterprise New Helvetia: New Switzerland. He sought, and obtained, treaties recognizing his sovereignty with Mexico, Russia, and the US. By 1849 Sutter's domain had rich farming, mighty live stock, not only employees and associates, but a private army.

Everything going swimmingly, he began to branch out into the lumber business. It was at his mill, all on "his" property that gold nuggets were found in the stream that powered the mill. It was Sutter's mill. Sutter's employees found the gold. Rightly, they reported their finding to Sutter. They were due some of the value: they found it; he was due some: they found it because they were on his land, doing his bidding. The owner gets some, the finders get some. But Sutter told them to keep mum: develop the lumber, then I'll think about developing metals.

Meantime the employees' kids played openly with the gold. Strangers passing by saw the kids, scoffed that the kids had real gold nuggets. Their moms said, "Oh, no: it's real gold alright." And that was the end of Sutter's New Helvetia, his agriculture, his lumber, his army, his mining.

People from the east poured west: over Sutter's route (finding other routes as well: once traffic was possible, it spread). (Did we thank him for the knowledge? Did we pay him a toll?) No, we tresspassed, panned for (his) gold, got hungry, killed his livestock.

The US put a court house in a rapidly developing San Franciso. Sutter summed his losses and sued. Twelve judges saw justice in his claim, awarded him hundreds of millions of dollars. The new citizens of San Francisco, suddenly finding themselves due for back rent and damages burned the court house to the ground. The judges scattered for their lives.

The US was used to gobbling land. The US, like any imperial kleptocracy, was used to taking whatever it wanted. What was different here was that we were stealing from a "white" man! It's doubly wicked irony that he'd invited us to share with him in the first place.

Oh, I don't doubt that Sutter wanted the lion's share. Why shouldn't he? Maybe he would have been difficult to work with, or for. Still, even if we'd declared emminent domain, we're building our highway through your living room, we should have paid him something for the land, the cattle, the lost profits ...

Sutter may have been the first white man robbed by the mob of white men. (He's the first I can name, where we all know the name.) But he wasn't the last: I offered social networking to the public in 1970 (as an alternative to social coercion in education: establish a cybernetic data base of learning resources, then every body mind their own business). (Johnny can learn to read: if he wants to. If Johnny choses not to and starves to death, it's nobody's business but Johnny's. If Sammy learns to read in twelve days instead of twelve years, then corners the rock-and-roll market, good for him. School was nothing really but a Procrustean bed anyway.

I asked for help, for resources, to build infrastructure. Years passed, decades. Then suddenly coercive governments and their institutional tools shove digital record keeping up our noses. I offered cheap public software development years before Microsoft was founded. I tried to engage IBM in my ideas in 1971, decades before they invested a penny in internet-related R&D. Bill Gates still didn't want anything to do with "the" (stolen) internet even after the internet was a world-wife phenomenon!

"You" all could have had convivial cheap versions of all of these things before there was such a thing as the PC! Once you did decide that you wanted them (after the kleptocracy's version was shoved up your nose) (after the money was taken from your pocket), someone should have noticed me: impoverished, a pariah, my son kidnapped, afforded no protection from the law, not published, now censored: all because I devoted my life to trying to deliver God's messages of social salvation (to people who still don't get Jesus' messages of spiritual salvation!)

I should have been killed the second the school noticed that I was intelligent. At least I should have been killed the second the fed realized that they wanted to steal and pervert my ideas. But I'm still alive, somehow, among the double-damned.

Monday, October 25, 2010

The End Is Coming

Media-laden society is always hearing about doomsday predictions. Only careful readers and listeners will realize how many there are. Only scholars will document how many doomsdays come and go without the forecast-doom arriving. Jim Jones may have known what he was doing when he led his group of believers to suicide before they could all be disappointed in his election.

Churches destroy evidence the way Alexander killed his brothers once the king had died. Alexander knew he would have civil wars enough, enough challenges to his anointing, without his brothers coming up with alternate wills. If the Apocalypse of John is the only apocalypse Christians know, then they'll think it's unique: a dime a dozen lowers the value (to make a redundancy joke).

I just read online about another. And John, and Nostradomos, and some of my own rhetoric came flowing past me. What brings me here to scribble these words is a thought of the purpose of false predictions in a media-laden society: if the sheeple hear false prediction after false prediciton, they'll become skeptical about doomsday predictions and lull themselves into a belief that they're secure, that nothing can harm them. If Jim Jones was full of it, and even Jesus' Kingdom of God didn't arrive soon after his death (or since, so far as we can tell), why then global warming can't harm us: and neither can smoking, or cheating, or lying, or the medacious ignorant politically agenda'd school board!


I foisted a The End Is Coming joke decades ago. A friend gave a costume party under the theme Vicars and tarts. Males were supposed to dress church-related; the females were supposed to dress as though they were hawking their wares. I dressed as a prophet: beard, long robe. I carried a doom sign. Hung from my waist, over my cod, was a sign that said "The end is c-c-coming": with an orthographic joke on orgasm you see, and over my behind was a matching sign that said, with relief, "The end is come."

Monday, October 18, 2010

Friday, October 15, 2010

Society

We're social animals. Me too. Thus, naturally, I love society: depend on it, agree with our ancestors survival choice to group.

But I hate this society.

Society in contrast loves itself ... and hates me.

Society in general says it follows God, worships Jesus, but of course it does just the opposite. Those who follow God, or try to, or who ally with Jesus, or try to (those who overturn the money changing tables in the temple, or try to), are still isolated, persecuted, silenced. And society has no conscience about it. (Neither is society very conscious.)


I started drafting this intending it for InfoAll, my deschooling, deregulation, deprofessionalizing blog. But now I remind one and all that the major part of my Knatz.com, a censorship casualty of the fed destroying my AgainstHierarchy.org, was my Teaching area, and the largest area of that was my Society folders (with their myriad sub-folders!)

More on the same set of metaphors will appear at a range of blogs, including this one, and including InfoAll.